Let me start with this
- I'm familiar with red shift
measurements and other observations from many brilliant scientists that
suggest the universe started with a Big Bang.
I'm not going to
argue with any of this evidence, only suggest that maybe our
interpretation of the observations might some day change. I say
this because there's something about the Big Bang that is not logical
for me, and I've always had a hunch there's a lot more, that maybe it
did not quite happen in the currently accepted way. Here are some
ideas why.
First of all, scientists say the
universe began when Time or t = 0 from a 'point'. Let's
examine what a point is. No matter how infinitesimally small it
might have been, a point is defined by having Mass, a location in Space,
and some form of inherent Energy. Since none of these can exist
independent of each other or without time, at t = 0, so do Space, Energy
and Matter = 0 as well. In fact, in our physical universe, STE & M
can't exist independently and each one cannot be exactly defined except
by reference to the other three.
If there was in fact no Space,
there was no place to put a 'point'. And without anything
to direct where it would be located, how and why did the universe begin
where it did instead of somewhere else? And where did it begin
anyway and in relation to what since there was no space/ time to define
it's location? Where are we anyway? Where is our universe?
Further, at STEM = 0, there was no
Matter to make a point and no Space to put it, no Time to define it, and
no Energy to make anything happen. Simply stated, there was
nothing, 'no thing' at all. Now if we agree with the Big Bang
theory we're in the embarrassing position of violating one of the
primary laws of science, that you can't make something out of nothing.
How can we rationally suggest that a pin head, a 'thing' that can't
possibly exist at T = 0 anyway, really could have spawned a billion
galaxies? Not logical. So now what?
In addition to the above, there are
a couple of other things that don't make sense to me.
Imagine a July 4th rocket shooting
into the night sky and then exploding with a burst of stars. What
happens? In straight lines from the center, the stars shoot out to
form a circle. Where they exploded from in the center, soon there's a
huge hole with nothing, and when they reach the limits of the
explosive force that propelled them, first they slow down, then they
stop moving and die.
From our observations, the universe
is not a nice big round circle with all the stars and galaxies
neatly placed around the edges from a single explosion. It
is more like a disk with a bulge in the center, many times wider than it
is high, more like a galaxy in shape, as if it were the product of a
'flat explosion'. With nothing existing at T = 0, where did the
limitations come from on the top and the bottom so it only exploded out
to the sides in a disk shape? Further, there should be a huge
empty hole in the center of the universe. If the universe is 13.7
billion years old and the explosion were a single event, shouldn't the
diameter of the universe be 27.4 billion light years with an empty space
at least 27 billion light years across from one side of the universe to
the other in the center?
Then we have two other worrying
problems. Instead fo slowing down as they should as the Big
Bang energy that propelled them wears down, galaxies at the edge of the
universe are acutally speeding up. And finally, it seems that
matter may be spontaneously appearing and disappearing in the universe
and does not appear to be created from the Big Bang.
It would seem we only have two
options from these observations that make any sense -
either there never was a condition of STEM = 0 so there could in fact be
a little point somewhere that the universe could 'Big Bang' from (which
violates the 'you can't make something from nothing law), or the
universe in its entirety came completely from beyond the STEM dimension,
beyond the laws of physics, our own language to define it, and obviously
far beyond our comprehension. Let's see if we can unwind these
thoughts.
Maybe you've answered the chicken
and egg question by now,
that the answer is
'neither'. What
came first was the potential for evolution that in linear time would
eventually produce a feathery dinosaur descendant that would be really
stupid and good to eat.
(What other animal starts each day by crowing to
all the predators in the neighborhood where to come and get breakfast?)
And on the point of potentials, think of
whatever you want in our universe and you will not find anything that
created itself. We are entirely an 'effect' universe
in which everything is the result of prior causes.
And before the causes could materialize, the potential for the linear
time development of all events and the final results and eventual
extinction of all causal evolution in some form or other already existed
as well. And in regards to things that could not have created
themselves, that includes space, time, energy and matter. There
was nothing at T = 0, so nothing existed that had the ingredients to
create any of them. This is really important to keep in mind - at
T = 0, there are no points, no potentials - there is nothing.
Because it seems to be the prison,
the cage of all material things, let's look at linear time.
In our physical universe and for our type of consciousness, we have
several dimensions of time - the past, present and future. They
are all part of our linear time flow. We can never escape what has
happened - it will always be there. The present can never escape
becoming part of the past, and the future can never escape becoming
first the present and then the past. So what is there if there is
no time as we know it? What can exist beyond time?
Is it possible that consciousness
can exist beyond STEM?
If we can show that consciousness
can exist beyond STEM in another dimension in parallel with our own, then that opens up a whole new approach to the origin and nature of the
universe. I touched on some of these thoughts briefly in the page
on Black Elk and Crazy Horse, their experiences of an 'outer world', the
'real world behind this one and this world is just a shadow of that
world' as they described it.
Michio Kaku and other
physicists are still suggesting our universe came from an
infinitesimally small 'point', that there were 'membranes' beyond
our universe, and when they touched, our universe suddenly exploded into being.
Physicists also suggest that these 'membranes' can touch many times and
whenever they do, many different universes and different dimensions come
into being.
What are these
'membranes' anyway? The problem here is that 'membranes' occupy
space, need time to exist, and have energy in motion so they can touch -
all of which are not possible and cannot exist in T = 0.
The 'membrane' idea is just not logical. It is not possible
for our universe to appear from any condition except where T = 0.
And nothing that exists after T = 0 has the power to
generate the quantity of energy and matter the universe contains.
So what have I come up
with? I'm not saying I have the answers, but from my own years of
experience and research, here are a few ideas to think about.
Imagine you are sleeping and you dream. A sequence of pictures
appears in your mind. Synapses actuate a series of images that
create a fleeting reality within your existing brain. Your dream
is filled with fantasy places and people and events that seem very real
in the dream dimension.
The dream requires no
significant 'energy'.
There
are neither 'big' nor 'small' in your dream because it takes no more
energy to think of a butterfly than it does to think of colorful trees
and lakes and mountains.
The
dream is completely an 'effect' event of a person with a brain and past
experiences about which to create a dream - the potentials are all there
for the dream to happen in the way it happens.
For the universe, maybe
dark
matter and dark energy are the 'brain', and the stars and galaxies are
'dreams' formed here in this dark matter 'brain' by a different kind of
'sleeper' from a different dimension with different experiences on which
to draw for the 'dream images'.
Maybe galaxies in our
universe are like leaves being dropped onto a whirlpool in a pond that
already has motion and other qualities from its center to its farthest
reaches.
Maybe there never was an
explosion because the motion already existed in dark matter before STEM
galaxies came into being. For this 'dreamer', there are no 'big'
or 'small' either and our whole universe had to come from 'nothing',
defined as a reality beyond and unlimited by the laws of physics, at a
'real' T = 0.
Only something I call
'circumferal time', a state in which past, present and future are
simultaneous, is 'big enough' to contain linear time. It is the
only state we can even conceive of that would be beyond the laws of
physics, remain beyond the laws of physics while having the potential to
express time as a flat line event as well as a circle.
Only something that
already contains all potentials as completed events beyond time has the
potential to express these same events in a linear time sequence, like
the dinosaur to chicken to egg. Logic also suggests that in a
'pre-matter causal dimension' for our physical universe, all potentials
and events are in fact already completed - they have to be because there
is no time to allow them to start and finish any kind of cycle.
STEM 'reality' is only a temporary condition, at one time did not exist,
came from 'nothing', and if the 'dreamer' dreaming our universe ever
wakes up, the whole universe will instantly disappear.
My research suggests our
whole universe is just a hologram amid interweaving dimensions all
derived from an unimaginable creative consciousness that simultaneously
embodies All That Was, Is and Ever Could Be throughout the countless
time and non-time, physical, etheric and spiritual dimensions of
eternity. It is inconceivable, immeasurably beyond and not related to anything yet
imagined, named or created by our little superstitious, STEM - bound brains.
As soon as we
cross this line, no Phds or other advanced study in physics can help us.
All the observations of brilliant scientists,
all the theories and formulas and everything within the realm of the
laws of physics become meaningless. e=mc2 is irrelevant. We
are now in a realm beyond our physical ability to observe, experiment, define,
affect or control. How could a fish observe and understand the
life and actions of an eagle? Trying to find physical proof of
and somehow control non-physical events is like trying to carve a blast of steam with an
icicle.
As a scientist, you cross
this barrier at your peril because your colleagues have made
going beyond physics verboten as if going there will cause you to catch
some kind of scary desease. As he told me, for his research
in the paranormal in Russia, physicist Andre Linde harmed his
reputation. Steven Hawking was also criticized for some words in a
documentary about leaving room 'for the hand of God'.
But here below the line,
now you are all in my
field and that of many others like me. Beyond T = 0 is
called 'meta' physics. When Michio Kaku and other scientists cross the line
and try to define what happened before T = 0, now they're in my domain,
and I began my work in this area in 1967.
With highest respect for
Dr. Kaku and all the other scientists into whose territories I would never venture, and
whose work I would never dream to question, I would like you to know
that beyond t = 0 , I'm the one with the Phd. For those of you
interested in going further, please check out my book.
From experiences and research over the
last 40 years, I wrote the book MILLENNIUM REGENESIS - A New Vision for
a Quantum Eternity'. It examines if there is in fact consciousness
beyond t = 0, do we have a 'partner dimension' and if so, can we
experience it consciously from our dimension and how do we reach and
interact with it.
Thanks for the fall colors from "Smoky
Mountains Photo Courtesy of Richard Weisser and SmokyPhotos.com" at
http://smokyphotos.com
For the photo of the chicken, our thanks to the people at
http://www.suburbanchicken.org in
Lemon Grove California.
The photo of the butterfly is thanks to the people at
www.potomacs.com
The photo of Glacier National Park came from the park web site.
